Sensible child-rearing
by Red Rose ~ December 11th, 2004
[Headline in the style of Mark Shea, who has his good points, even though he has no time for the Annals whatsoever.]
I’m not sure much direct comment is necessary to a story detailing a ruling by the Washington State Supreme Court that “Parents can’t monitor kids’ phone calls”, as a result of agitation on some incorrigible 14-year-old girl’s boyfriend’s behalf by the Anti-Christian Licentiousness Union (ACLU). The ruling may apply only to that one state, but as part and parcel of a trend it is all too clear….
[N.B. 12/12] In consideration of some comments received privately, what I had posted here needed considerably more work to say exactly what I intended, so I have removed it and will defer it to a time when I can incorporate the objections submitted to me. That probably won’t be until early next year: that is, if I still have the Annals going by then. Certain short-term needs are asserting themselves in suchwise as to cause me to consider whether to put this blog on hiatus….
Reply to Sensible child-rearing
Related posts to Sensible child-rearing
Divorced parents back together just for Christmas
Yes, it's one of those intendedly "heartwarming" stories of how we in the 21st Century are making advances in how we celebrate the "holiday season":...
No King but Caesar #3: On Candlemas Day, some rancid Christmas leftovers
The rest of the country will talk about some groundhog in Pennsylvania today, but serious Catholics know that the real significance of this day is...
Election reflections
What follows are a few loosely-connected thoughts in epilogue to my election considerations posted last Oct. 19th.... * * * Forget about unemployment problems, or Social...
Commercial Christmas season begins!
Deck the malls with bows of holly: fa la la la la, la la, la la! T'is the season to go shopping: fa la la...
No Responses to Sensible child-rearing
Follow-up RSS Comments Feed or Leave a Trackback